Don’t be so Dogmatic Bro

Like many millennials of my generation, I pride myself on being as open-minded as possible. My viewpoints mostly depend on evidence, not what tradition dictates. Open-mindedness is a fantastic way to live. With an open mind, you will learn to be accepting of all people, have your beliefs challenged, and be willing to be proven wrong. Keeping that in mind, when it comes time to discuss important topics like religion, politics, equality, etc., you will undoubtedly come across some rather dogmatic people.

cm

Dogmatism is the worst. It is defined as the expression of an opinion or belief as if it were fact. These people value traditional thinking over hard evidence. Some will even be relentless in letting you know that you are wrong and they are right. Let me give you an example of a particular dogmatist in my life that pisses me off on a regular basis.

 

I won’t name names, but for the sake of this article, let’s call this person Steve. We disagree on the topic of climate change. I believe climate change is real and he believes it is a hoax. Here is how a typical argument with Steve goes…

 

Me: Steve, evidence from The Journal of Atmospheric Chemistry and Physics suggests that the huge increase in greenhouse gases and carbonaceous aerosols in the Northern Hemisphere has greatly affected the chemical integrity of our atmosphere.

 

Steve: That’s bullshit, nobody can see the atmosphere.

 

Me: You are correct. We cannot physically see the atmosphere. However, we have proven methods to measure the concentrations of certain gas particles which directly correlate to the area which those same gaseous particles are being omitted. In other words, we can measure how much smog is above New York City and determine how it negatively affects that area of the atmosphere.

 

Steve: You can use all the fancy science words you want. Anyone who believes that garbage is an idiot. Case closed.

 

… and so goes this vicious circle. I present Steve with some evidence, he rejects it by responding with uninformed answers, and then shuts down the conversation.

butt mind

Domgatists such as Steve are entitled to believe whatever the hell they want. Fair enough. However, I draw the line at the name-calling and the flat out ignorance of the evidence. To be fair, not everyone has a science background and spends their time reading research journals about climate change (that’s for nerds like me). With that said, Steve still looks like an ignorant dumbass by responding with empty statements like “scientists can’t see the atmosphere”. All while claiming to be educated on the topic.

 

So there’s my rant on dogmatism and closed-mindedness. In closing, I would like to encourage everyone out there to stay open-minded and flexible in your opinions. Life is better that way.

 

2 thoughts on “Don’t be so Dogmatic Bro

  1. I’m going to be the devils advocate and ask you if you’ve got evidence that climate change is an actual problem. You don’t because it’s not you who has visually seen the increase of gas carbonaceous aerosols (unless the magazine contained pictures;) ), but scientists who have researched the issue.
    Even from an academical point of view there is a big issue with articles coming from renowed journals which is that the scientists featured in them not only want to educate and research just for the sake of researching, they also want to get there name out there which might cause misrepresentation even a bias in their research.
    In this specific case I do believe that climate issue is a big problem and that the current situation is bad, avoiding it out of fear (like Steve seems to do) is not going to improve the situation but there are a lot of cases in which fake news or fake research has been published and so I get why some people might not always immediately become believers.
    That said you’re a great writer, I really enjoyed reading this!

    Like

    1. Thanks for the comment and feedback! I could not agree more that one must be conscious of what journals to read and rely on. When discussing the issue of climate change with nay sayers, I always do my best to cite the journals accurately and make sure I have the information straight. It’s so easy to throw around fancy science terms and call it evidence.
      Yes, it would be foolhardy to say that ALL people who do not believe in climate change are ignorant and uneducated. There are plenty of folks who have extensively researched the topic and feel that it is not such an imminent threat.
      I agree to beware of the fake news! With so much conflicting evidence out there, it puts us all in a bind as to which sources to agree with. Thanks!

      Liked by 1 person

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out /  Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )

Connecting to %s